Last Updated: May 28, 2006
The questions and answers that follow discuss some of the current issues involving Health Care.
We hope that the questions and answers presented here will assist you in familiarizing yourself with Health Care Law issues and terms. While the material below attempts to answer common questions in this area, State and local laws may significantly modify the facts set forth. Because all legal problems are unique, nothing provided here is a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. We strongly urge you to consult with an attorney licensed to practice in your state about any particular legal problem you may have.
"Managed
care" is a method of providing health care coverage to patients at reduced
costs to employers and others. Under the managed care system, both the patient
and the doctor are managed through rules imposed by the managed care company.
These rules generally limit the patient's choice of both doctors and other
health care providers such as labs, x-ray facilities, hospitals, visiting nurse
service, etc. The managed care rules also limit a doctor's options in treating
you. The managed care system controls costs by limiting the amount of money
spent on diagnosing and treating a patient's problem. Health maintenance
organizations (HMOs) and preferred provider organizations (PPOs) are two most
common types of managed care entities.
Yes.
Both HMOs and PPOs
use a variety of
approaches to change and limit your doctor's decision-making powers and limit
the amount of money spent on providing your medical benefits. HMOs and PPOs use
two major techniques to limit the tests and treatment to the patient. The first
technique uses nurses to act as "case reviewers." The nurses or other
reviewer can tell your doctor how to handle your case. The second technique
uses your primary doctor as a "gatekeeper." Your primary doctor, the
gatekeeper, is responsible for limiting referrals to specialists, x-rays, and
lab tests, among other benefits.
The
doctrine of informed consent imposes on
your doctor a "duty
to disclose" certain information to you before any surgery or potentially
dangerous test is performed. While the standard varies from state to state, in
Pennsylvania the standard is whether "the physician disclosed all the
facts, alternatives, and risks that a reasonable person in the situation, which
the physician knew or should have known to be the patient's, would declare
significant in making a decision to undergo the recommended treatment." So
if you are mentally and physically able to discuss your condition, in the
absence of an emergency, your informed consent is required before any surgery
or test can be completed by the physician. If your doctor performs surgery,
etc., without your informed consent, he or she has committed an "assault
and battery" upon you and is liable for any resulting injuries, regardless
of whether the treatment was performed negligently. Whether you would not have
gone through with the operation if warned of a particular danger is irrelevant
in this situation.
A
lawsuit brought by an injured patient against a physician to recover for
injuries sustained from a medical malpractice claim has always been an accepted
type of claim. Health insurance companies that provide your health insurance coverage as a benefit through
your employer are given special privileges which allow them to be exempted from many lawsuits.
This is slowly changing, to allow more and more lawsuits. Certain states have
enacted statutes requiring that health insurers disclose all of the insurance
terms to their insureds.
Medical
technology has evolved over the past twenty-five years to the point that
patients with terminal diseases can be kept alive at times, through the
administration of treatments and life support. A series of cases over the past
thirty years has established your right to control crucial aspects of your
care. Patients with irreversible medical conditions have gained permission to
decline treatment that will "sustain" their lives. Under the Patient
Self-Determination Act, health care facilities must inform patients of their
right to prepare advanced directives and authorize doctors in advance to let
the patient die by withdrawing or withholding life-prolonging procedures. Protecting your rights
should be done in writing in advance with an advance health care directive, with the
assistance of an attorney who is experienced with these issues.
Yes.
The False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§3729-3733, imposes liability on any company or
individual doing business with the federal government, for fraudulent acts. The
qui tam (pronounced "key tam") provision of this Act allows any
employee of these companies, with knowledge of the fraud, to bring suit on
behalf of the United States to recover the fraudulent payments. Some
settlements in qui tam actions against health care providers have run into the
hundreds of millions of dollars. Because the statute is complex, you should
consult with an attorney before proceeding. Remember, the Act applies to all
businesses doing business with the federal government, not just health care
providers.
DESSEN, MOSES & ROSSITTO is happy to assist you in any legal matter that involves either Pennsylvania or New Jersey, the two states in which our attorneys routinely practice. If you wish to contact us for more information concerning this field of law or any other in which we practice, please send us an E-mail message and we will be happy to assist you.
LINKS TO OTHER INTERESTING INFO
Autoimmune Liver Disease Group
Department of Justice
Health Care Finance Administration
(Medicare/Medicaid)
Health Care Resources on the Internet
Living Wills: Common Questions and Answers
National Institutes of Health
PBC Liver Disease Group
Social Security Administration (SSA)
Top of Page | DM&R Home Page
| Legal Article Wall
About DM&R | To Retain
DM&R | Ask Us A Question
Copyright © 1996 -
2006 Dessen, Moses & Rossitto
All rights reserved.